Responsibility For Romeo And Juliet's Deaths
Responsibility for Romeo and Juliet's Deaths
There is much controversy to who is to blame for the deaths of Romeo
and Juliet, a number of things and people could be held responsible
for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet. But who is responsible for their
deaths? Even before the play begins the grudge between the Capulet and
Montague families has begun. Because of this, it becomes imminent that
one thing or event will start off a sequence of incidents that will
end in tragedy.
The on-going feud between the Montague and Capulet families could be
held responsible for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet, because if their
was no feud between these families then Romeo and Juliet would have
been able to have a safe normal relationship in which their family
would have agreed to. The feud meant that they had to keep their
relationship under wraps and tip-toe around their families. The
ancient grudge between the two families meant that if one member of
either family found out about Romeo and Juliet then they would be
‘If they do see thee, they will murder thee.’
The family feud between the Montague and Capulet families could also
be held responsible for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet because they
both grew up with people dieing within the families because of the
grudge. For instance Mercutio and Tybalt, Mercutio was a very loyal
friend of Romeo’s and Tybalt was Juliet’s cousin. The deaths of these
characters meant that Romeo and Juliet were both distressed and
unhappy, and thus could have given more reason to their own deaths,
‘ A’ Thursday let it be, a’ Thursday, tell her,
She shall be married to this noble earl.
Will you be ready? Do you like this haste?
We’ll keep no great ado – a friend or two.
For, hark you, Tybalt being slain so late,
It may be thought we held him carelessly,’
The family feud could, again, be held responsible for the deaths of
Romeo and Juliet because the way they were both brought up meant they
were surrounded by hate and violence,
‘Three civil brawls bred of an airy word,
By three, old Capulet, and Montague,
Have thrice disturbed the quiet of our streets.’
Finally the family feud could be held responsible for the deaths of
Romeo and Juliet as it is this that starts off the chain of events
that lead to their deaths. For instance, the two family’s on-going
feud drives Romeo to kill one of Juliet’s relatives and thus he finds
himself banned from Verona. They then construct a plan to meet again,
but when the plan goes awry, the two star-crossed lovers take their
The grudge between the Montague and Capulet families eventually leads
to the deaths of Romeo and Juliet. Even though other events and people
lead to their deaths, the ancient grudge is a main reason why these
‘two star-crossed lovers’ take their own...
Loading: Checking Spelling0%
Romeo and Juliet - characters responsible for their deaths.526 words - 2 pages Romeo and JulietThis essay will prove from my point of view, that three characters with their actions, decisions and timing were most responsible for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet.In my opinion, the character most responsible was Friar Lawrence, for he married Romeo...
Romeo and Juliet are to Blame for Their Own Deaths3363 words - 13 pages Romeo and Juliet are to Blame for Their Own Deaths Shakespeare is said to be one of the greatest sonnet and playwrights of the last millennium. In this assignment I am going to explore and write about one of Shakespeare's most famous and talked about plays "Romeo and Juliet". Shakespeare didn't only write tragedies (Romeo and Juliet is a tragedy as we will see in throughout this task). He also wrote comedies, sonnets,...
Romeo and Juliet: Was Romeo & Juliet's love controlled by fate?685 words - 3 pages Does fate play an important role in the lives of young love? Often, youths lives are controlled and guided by their parents' hands, but there are certain situations that are out of their control. Many aspects of Romeo and Juliet's lives were complete acts of fate, and fate was largely responsible for the outcome of each situation. Fate was directly involved...
Who or what was to be blamed for the deaths of romeo and juliet?1993 words - 8 pages The deaths of Romeo and Juliet appear needless, as it was mainly the people around them who were fighting and disagreeing about the relationship. Romeo and Juliet mainly kept out of the fighting but their lives were made miserable and unhappy by the people around them who were interfering, and because they were so deeply in love with each other, they refused to be split up and therefore took risks to stay together which eventually led to their...
Who is Responsible for the Tragic Deaths of Romeo and Juliet1741 words - 7 pages Who is Responsible for the Tragic Deaths of Romeo and Juliet 'Romeo and Juliet', a tragedy written by William Shakespeare in the 16th Century all about two strong hearted teenagers in the city of Verona in Italy who fall in love with each other as 'star crossed lovers'. The two young teenagers of feuding families were destined to fall in love, however many problems occur to the extent of suicide, that affect their...
Who is Most Responsible for the Deaths in William Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet637 words - 3 pages Who is Most Responsible for the Deaths of Romeo and Juliet Romantic love stories are often ended with a tragedy, because of loss of passion or a loved one. These tragedies are often the result of one person’s actions that ended someone’s life or love. In the Romeo and Juliet play written by William Shakespeare, two citizens of Verona come together and fall deeply in love. Unfortunately their love comes to an end, along with their lives,...
The Tragic Deaths of Romeo and Juliet1438 words - 6 pages The Tragic Deaths of Romeo and Juliet Romeo and Juliet, two young and helpless star-crossed lovers that deal with war, rivalry, death and tragedy throughout the play. Whom is to blame for the traggic death of both? Their raging parents that are never settled? Friar Lawrence that married them both? The old nurse that cares for Juliet? Or is it all just bad luck and a coincidence? Shakespeares' intention of the play...
The Deaths of Romeo and Juliet1845 words - 7 pages The Deaths of Romeo and Juliet Romeo and Juliet "From forth the fatal loins of these two foes A pair of star-cross'd lovers take their life;" I don't agree with the quotation above because I think the tragic deaths of both Romeo and Juliet are caused by human decision. It is an indirect result of the decisions and actions Romeo and Juliet is...
The Deaths of Romeo and Juliet2678 words - 11 pages The Deaths of Romeo and Juliet At the end of the play ‘Romeo and Juliet’ the Prince blames the two parents for the deaths of the ‘two star-crossed lovers’ death: ‘See what a scourge is laid upon your hate, That heaven finds means to kill your joys with love!’ (Act V, Scene III Lines 292-293) But the parents are not entirely to blame for the tragic deaths of Romeo and Juliet. Everyone who comes into close...
To what extent can Tybalt truely be blamed for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet.763 words - 3 pages Tybalt is shown as a villain in Romeo and Juliet but how much can he really be blamed?Tybalt is a proud and patriotic Capulet cousin, his name reflects his personality (tybalt means the prince of cats) he is a rare swordsman and fights with honor, although he does take personal insults very far he can be viewed in two ways, first as a racist, prejudiced...
Juliet's Growth Throughout William Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet1296 words - 5 pages Juliet's Growth Throughout William Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet In Romeo and Juliet, there are many things that manipulate Juliet's path of growth, in terms of mentality. This would include things like:- The Nurse, Juliet's Parents, Romeo and Fate. One of the most important issues in the tragedy of Romeo and Juliet is that of choice. Do the characters have the ability to choose what they want to do, or are they...
Post your essay. Get expert feedback. For free.We're trying to help students improve their writing the hard way. Do you know students who want critical essay reviews from a professor of English Literature? Click like to share. Click here to sign up and post your own essay. We offer no paid services. All reviews are completely free.
Romeo And Juliet - Parents Making An Impact - With A Free Essay Review
Parents today are an important influence on their children. It is their job to teach them right from wrong, do the right actions, and make the best decisions. Parents have a huge impact on our lives. In William Shakespeares tragic play Romeo and Juliet, two star-crossed lovers fall in love despite their feuding families. Their love meets many obstacles- deaths, banishment, their parents and friends- on their journey to the end. Through all of this, the Capulet and Montague parents are most to blame for the gruesome deaths because they feud with each other, force Juliet to marry Paris, and change the wedding to a day earlier than planned.
One reason that the parents cause the tragic deaths in the play is how they have been feuding with each other for many years. As the tragic play opens, Sampson and Gregory, two Capulets, walk the streets of Verona talking about the Montagues. Sampson exclaims, I / will push Montagues men from the wall and thrust his / maids to the wall (Rom.1.1.15-17). This expresses the utter most hate that the two families have for each other. It is obvious that the parents are to blame from this instance because if they did not feud with one another, then it would not be a problem for Romeo and Juliet to fall in love. Also, if the families had not been fighting, the fight between their servants, Sampson, Gregory, and Abram, would never have happened. This brawl led to amplified hate because it brought back age-old problems the reader is uninformed of. The actions in the play cause a domino effect, and in other words, if one action did not happen, the ones afterwards would not either. For example, if the fight in the streets of Verona did not happen, then Benvolio would not have had to break it up, bringing Tybalt into the mess. The fight that started in the beginning of the play was initiated with an ancient feud between the Montagues and the Capulets.
The next reason the parents are to blame for the deaths in the final scenes of the tragic play is because they force Juliet into marrying Paris. Juliets father angrily explains, Be fettle your fine joints gainst Thursday next/ to go with Paris to Saint Peters church, / or I will drag thee on a hurdle there (Rom.3.5.158-160). Being pressured into becoming the wife of Paris, Juliet felt upset and exploited. She begs at her fathers knees in an attempt to change his relentless mind. The mixed feelings of her undying love for Romeo and her distress in doing something she does not want to do cause her to solicit advice from Friar Lawrence. He comes up with a plan that involves a potion. If Juliet was not forced into becoming the wife of Paris by her parents, then Friar Lawrence would not to of had to make the plan that blew up and ended up killing the lovers. Capulet and Lady Capulets decision of marrying Juliet and Paris led to the many deaths in the tragedy.
The last reason Romeo and Juliets parents are to blame for the outcome of the play is that they changed the wedding day. As the Capulet house organizes to tie the knot with Juliet and Paris, Juliet enters. Capulet thinks it will make her happier because he thinks that Juliet is sad about the death of Tybalt, her cousin. He thinks this because he does not know of Romeo and changes the wedding day a day earlier and orders, Send for the county. Go tell him of this. / Ill have this knot knit up tomorrow morning (Rom.4.2.25-26). This proves that the parents are to blame for the fatalities because if the wedding date was not changed, Friar Lawrences plan would have had enough time to play out and unravel. There are many miscommunications in the development of the plan following through. Romeo did not get the letter from Friar Lawrence informing him that he could go get Juliet from her tomb because his messenger got held back and there was not enough time. The parents caused this because if they had not changed the wedding date, the plan seems as it would play out correctly and end with Juliet going to Mantua and being with her husband, Romeo.
In William Shakespeares tragic play Romeo and Juliet, the parents numerous actions lead to the many despondent deaths in the final scenes. Throughout the play, Shakespeare reveals that feuding and fighting with somebody is never right and will just bring affliction in return. Not ever should one hold a grudge for so long, because it could stop good things from playing out.
To say that the parents are to blame seems to say that they caused the deaths in one way or another, and indeed you use the word cause in the first sentence of your second paragraph. Your first argument then attributes their blame to the fact that, in the prehistory of the play, they have maintained a long feud with each other. Obviously the parents, their mutual hatred and their consequent actions, have a hand in the way the tragedy unfolds. The only problem with your specific argument, a problem which persists throughout the essay, is that you seem to think of those actions as causes. At the same time, you say things like if they had not done X, then Y would not have happened. In such a case, however, X is not necessarily a cause of why but merely an event that is necessary for Y to happen (we can call it a condition of the possibility of Y: It makes it possible for Y to happen, but it doesnt make it necessary for Y to happen; it doesnt cause Y).
It will seem, perhaps, that Im being pedantic in drawing this distinction, but its an important one in light of your opening paragraph and your specific thesis. Your opening paragraph acknowledges that there are many obstacles faced by the young lovers. Your thesis the ... parents are MOST to blame for the gruesome deaths suggest the possibility that other persons or other forces might have a share of the blame. One of the weakness of the essay is its one-sided approach to the question of who or what is to blame. Your essay does not in fact show that the parents are most to blame; it just shows that they have a hand in bringing about those circumstances in which the tragedy could unfold.
Now if you want to speak strictly in terms of causes, and so apply a stricter measure of blame or responsibility, then it would be more difficult to make a strong case against the parents. (They would not be convicted in a modern court of law of killing their children.) They are obviously to blame (as your essay shows) for many of the specific circumstances that engendered the tragedy (and if _that_ were a crime, they would surely be convicted of it), but the answer to your larger question (who or what is responsible for the deaths of the young lovers) is necessarily more complicated. You might say that you are not interested in those complications, but rather just in clarifying how the parents contributed to the tragedy. But, on the one hand, that seems like a rather small slice of the play to be interested in, and, on the other hand, its not exactly true: your essay does acknowledge the role of other forces. For example, you call the lovers, as they are called in the play itself, star-crossed (which means something like screwed by fate!). You also note that the tragedy was brought about by virtue of miscommunications. Certainly you also say the unraveling of the Friars plan is a result of the changing of the wedding date, but that unraveling was of course also an unintended result. That is all to say, there is a good deal of misfortune involved.
To say that misfortune is involved can amount to saying that the lovers are merely unlucky; or it can mean instead that they are cursed by fortune or by fate (i.e., that they are star-crossed). Typically in tragedies those who are cursed by fate tend also to have a hand in their own destruction (hence the expression: character is destiny, which means that our fated destiny is in accord with our character, or, in stronger temrs, we are ourselves responsible for the tragic end that fate has in store for us - yes, its ambiguous). The role of luck or fortune or fate, and the possible role of the character of the lovers themselves, in bringing about the tragic end really ought to be given greater consideration if it really is your aim to establish that the parents are most to blame.
That phrase implies other persons or things have a share of the blame also. To say that the parents are most to blame is to say they have the greatest share of the blame. To prove that, you need not only to make the positive case, which is what you do in this essay by identifying the ways in which the parents are responsible, but also to compare the role of the parents with the role of whatever else might be said to contribute to the tragedy. That will make your argument more nuanced or complex, of course, but that is exactly what you should be aiming for: greater nuance, greater complexity.
P.S. of is not a form of the verb to have; so: not of had but have had.
Submitted by: leahhhhhx